Name: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, (PO No. 10 of ). Country: Pakistan. Subject(s): Civil, commercial and family law. Type of legislation: Regulation. Read, Name, Section, Definition, Cases. Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , 1 , Short title, extent and commencement, Cases · Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat. THE. QANUN‑E‑SHAHADAT ORDER, (X OF ). [28th October, ). CHAPTER V. OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Cases in which secondary.
|Published (Last):||9 March 2011|
|PDF File Size:||6.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Where a person gives evidence in a judicial proceedings qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 before any person authorized by law is relevant in later stage even if he conceals himself later on. No exception could be taken to concurrent findings of Courts below on specific issues.
An opinion, or the grounds on which that opinion is formed, the evidence qanun-e-shahada be of a person who holds that opinion on those grounds. Secretary of State 34 IA ; L. Piece of evidence determines the liability and punishment of an offender. Evidence, Qanun-e-shwhadat to sell. Hearsay is not evidence. A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
In criminal cases, where accused is being proceeded against for awarding Tazir punishment, Tazkiya-al-Shahood qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 not qanun-e-shahadat order 1984. In civil cases good character, being presumed, may not be proved in aggravation of damages, but bad character is admissible in qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 of damages, provided that it would not, if pleaded, amount to a justification. Privilege to waived by volunteering evidence.
Scribe can be treated to be an attesting witness although he has not signed it in that capacity. Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply: But if B refuses the fact of borrowing of Rs. Cases in which statement qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc. It is just investigation and proceedings which court conduct is called enquiry.
When qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 question is whether persons are partners, landlord and tenant, or principal and agent, and it has been shown that they have been acting as such, the burden of proving that they do not stand, or have ceased to stand, to each other in those relationships respectively, is on the person who affirms it. A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 this Article.
Qanun-e-sshahadat cannot be compelled to answer qqanun-e-shahadat as to this, except upon the special order of a superior Court.
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , | Jamil and Jamil
Appellate court does not require evidence. A statement in the diary of a deceased solicitor, regularly kept in the course of business that on a given day the solicitor attended A at a place mentioned, orver Peshawarfor the purpose of conferring qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 him upon specified business, is a relevant fact.
It is only court, which decides the matter on merit. This proof should be upto the satisfaction of court. When any transaction had been drawn and executed in form of document, no oral evidence could be allowed to be produced to prove same unless qanun–e-shahadat was shown that original document had been lost or could not qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 produced or procured qanuj-e-shahadat that, too, after obtaining permission from the Court for production of secondary evidence.
Document qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 in date, held, would have precedence over documents subsequent in date relating to transaction.
Character qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 the witnesses in both criminal and civil cases can be taken into consideration. Defamatory remarks made by a witness in his testimony in judicial proceeding against counsel in answer to a question in cross-examination. Where there are more originals than one, are original only need be proved.
Orddr, oral and documentary.
Permission qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 Trial Court for recording of secondary qanun-es-hahadat was not available on record – Original stamp vendor was dead and to prove the stamp paper on which the deed was written, the plaintiff produced son-in-law of the stamp vendor as qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 evidence – Validity – No secondary evidence could be produced unless allowed by, the Court – Where, entry on the stamp paper was non-existent in the register of the stamp vendor produced in the Trial Court and it was not proved that the Court had allowed to produce the secondary evidence.
Concurrent finding of fact of the three lower forums regarding the genuineness of the qanun-e-sshahadat to sell also did not suffer from any legal infirmity, misreading or non-reading of evidence. The fact that other harbours similarly situated qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 other respects, but where there were no such sea-walls, began to be obstructed at about the same time, is relevant.
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , 1984.
The cries of mob are qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 as explanatory of the nature of the transaction. The facts that the dog had previously bitten X, Y and Z and that they had made complaints to B, are relevant.
Law authorizes court to order any person to allow qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 Finger Impression to be taken for the purposes of any investigation or proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that such qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 has at qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 time been arrested in connection with such investigation or proceeding.
Competency of a witness. This evidence is as much as valuable as the evidence given by the actual person required. Mere information is nothing. Proof of facts by oral evidence. It should be ordrr in mind that clash in oral evidence extinguishes its truth-ness. Presence of relatives around the deceased.
The Court may presume that any book to which it qaanun-e-shahadat refer for information on matters of public or general interest, and that any published map or chart, the statements or which are relevant facts and which is produced for its inspection, was written and published by the person, and at the time and place, by whom or at which it purports to have been written or published.
The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, (10 of )
This fact may be proved. Before Police Qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 where is recovery. A confession must either admit in terms the offence or at any rate substantially all the facts, which constitute the offence.
If there is orser of reversal or acquittal lies in evidence then Appellate Court decides the return back the case to trial court for retrial.
Relevancy of statements as to facts irder public nature, contained in certain Qanun-e-syahadat or notifications. There is evidence to show that C was qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 by A and B, and that B said: A, B and C, three of qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 criminals, are captured on the shop and kept apart from each other. The facts that, not long before the date of the alleged will A made inquiry into matters to which the provisions of the alleged will relate, that he consulted advocates in reference to making the will, and that he caused drafts of other wills to be prepared of which he did not approve, are relevant.
An expert may give an account of experiments performed qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 qanun-e-hahadat for the purpose of forming his opinion.
Sale-deed executed in favour of vendee-defendant was, thus, not valid.